Council for a Livable World

Political action to reduce nuclear threats

  • Elections
    • Senate Candidates
    • House Candidates
    • Political Analysis
    • Who We’ve Helped Elect
  • Legislation
    • Key National Security Legislation
    • National Security Legislative Calendar
    • Legislative Achievements
  • Take Action
    • What ‘A House of Dynamite’ Tells Us and What You Can Do
    • Avoiding Oppenheimer’s Nuclear Nightmare in Our Current Reality
    • Twin Threats: Climate Change and Nuclear War
    • Issues
    • Join Our Email List
    • Become a Member
  • About
    • Staff
    • Press
    • Newsletter
    • Boards & Experts
    • Jobs & Internships
    • Financials and Annual Reports
    • Contact Us
  • Donate
  • Search
You are here: Home / Blog / What We’re Reading Now – Pentagon Happy With Omnibus Spending Bill

January 15, 2014

What We’re Reading Now – Pentagon Happy With Omnibus Spending Bill

DEFENSE SPENDING
Spending bill totals $1.1 trillion, includes $85.2 billion in OCO funding
The Pentagon requested only $79 billion in Overseas Contingency Operations (OCO) funding, but Congress appropriated an additional $6.2 billion. This spending bill will allow the Pentagon to avoid $20 billion in cuts that would have otherwise been made due to the sequester.

Procurement and R&D appropriations fall below requested figures
The White House requested $99.3 billion for defense procurements and $67.5 billion for research and development. The bill, however, appropriates $93 billion for procurement and $63 billion for R&D.

Planes, tanks, and submarines
Planned purchases of the F-35 will be fully funded, and the bill includes $90 million for upgrades to the M1 tank–upgrades that the Pentagon does not want. Moreover, Congress added $1.2 billion to the Pentagon’s request for procurement of the Virginia-class submarine, bringing the program’s total cost to about $6 billion.

For more on the Omnibus Bill
Follow the link above to explore the full text of the agreement and related reports.

IRAN
Senators voice opposition to new sanctions on Iran
Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR) and Sen. Chris Murphy (D-CT) signaled their opposition to any new sanctions that could derail the diplomatic process with Iran. Others including Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT), Sen. Tim Kaine (D-VA), and Sen. Bill Nelson (D-FL) have expressed similar sentiments. One of the bill’s original co-sponsors, Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-CT),  has stated that the bill should not come to a vote unless Iran reneges on the deal in place.

Posted in: Blog

Recent Posts

  • Human Rights Law Can Solve a Key Non-Proliferation Loophole November 21, 2025
  • Council: Front and Center: September 27, 2025 September 27, 2025
  • Council: Front and Center: August 17, 2025 August 17, 2025
  • Statement Ahead of Trump-Putin Summit August 15, 2025
  • Council: Front and Center: July 19, 2025 July 19, 2025
Council for a Livable World logo

820 1st Street NE, Suite LL-180
Washington, D.C. 20002
Phone: 202.543.4100

Elections

  • Meet The Candidates
  • Senate Candidates
  • House Candidates
  • Who We’ve Helped Elect

Legislation

  • Key National Security Legislation
  • National Security Legislative Calendar
  • Legislative Achievements

Take Action

  • Issues
  • Join Our Email List
  • Become a Member

About

  • History & Mission
  • Staff
  • Press
  • Newsletter
  • Boards & Experts
  • Jobs & Internships
  • Financials and Annual Reports
  • Contact Us
  • Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Instagram
  • Facebook

© 2026 Council for a Livable World
Privacy Policy