Council for a Livable World

Political action to reduce nuclear threats

  • Elections
    • Senate Candidates
    • House Candidates
    • Political Analysis
    • Who We’ve Helped Elect
  • Legislation
    • Key National Security Legislation
    • National Security Legislative Calendar
    • Legislative Analysis
    • Legislative Achievements
  • Take Action
    • Issues
    • Join Our Email List
    • Become a Member
  • About
    • Staff
    • Press
    • Newsletter
    • Boards & Experts
    • Jobs & Internships
    • Financials and Annual Reports
    • Contact Us
  • Donate
  • Search
You are here: Home / Blog / Working Group asks Congress to fully fund non proliferation programs

December 6, 2010

Working Group asks Congress to fully fund non proliferation programs

Earlier this year, both relevant House and Senate subcommittees decided to fully fund Non proliferation programs despite the current economic climate and competing funding demands.

However, the first Continuing Resolution passed at the end of September to fund the government through December 3 funded most government programs at FY 2010 levels, including programs to secure and safeguard nuclear weapons and materials.

In response, the Fissile Materials Working Group (FMWG) put together a letter to members urging them to fully fun these crucial programs at FY-2011 levels. You can find the text to the letter below.

Dear Colleague,

We urge you to support funding for threat reduction and nonproliferation
programs at FY 2011 requested levels in the next continuing resolution or
omnibus appropriations bill that Congress must pass to fund the
government. This funding is a necessary step to achieve the cooperative
international effort to secure all vulnerable nuclear, chemical and biological
materials in the foreseeable future.

Most experts agree that the threat of nuclear terrorism is the greatest peril
facing our country today. Twenty countries are believed to possess bombgrade
nuclear material that is not secure. Nuclear security will require a
global effort, but U.S. leadership is critical.

In April 2010, the President convened an unprecedented Nuclear Security
Summit in Washington D.C. during which the leaders of 47 nations pledged
their support for the four-year goal and made promises to take concrete
measures toward achieving it. Numerous bipartisan reports have outlined
the urgency of the danger and warned that more needs to be done to ensure
that terrorists never obtain a nuclear weapon or materials usable for a
nuclear device.

In FY 2011, the Obama administration requested $3.1 billion for
international WMD security programs, a $320 million increase over the FY
2010 budget. The FY 2011 request includes significant increases for key
threat-reduction and nonproliferation programs at the National Nuclear
Security Administration (NNSA) and the Department of Defense, including
the Global Threat Reduction Initiative, the International Material Protection
and Cooperation Program, and the “Nunn-Lugar” Cooperative Threat
Reduction Program.

Earlier this year, both relevant House and Senate subcommittees decided to
fully fund these important programs despite the current economic climate
and competing funding demands.

However, the first Continuing Resolution passed at the end of September to
fund the government through December 3 funded most government
programs at FY 2010 levels, including programs to secure and safeguard
nuclear weapons and materials. This was a setback to efforts to prevent
nuclear terrorism because the overall funding request and congressional
appropriations for threat reduction in FY 2010 was actually less than the
amount Congress appropriated in FY 2009.

There is a bipartisan consensus that limiting access to vulnerable nuclear
weapons-usable materials will greatly reduce the threat of nuclear terrorism.

The global financial cost and terrible destruction of a nuclear terrorist attack would dwarf the costs ofpreventing such an attack.

We urge you to ensure that threat reduction and nonproliferation programs at NNSA and the Department ofDefense are funded at the FY 2011 level for the remainder of the fiscal year. Our national security demands it.

Sincerely,

Matthew Bunn
Project on Managing the Atom
Harvard Kennedy School of Government

David Culp
Friends Committee on National Legislation

Charles Ferguson
Federation of American Scientists

Howard L. Hall
The University of Tennessee

John Isaacs
Council for a Livable World

Daryl G. Kimball
Arms Control Association

Alan J. Kuperman
University of Texas at Austin

Kenneth Luongo
Partnership for Global Security

Vlad Sambaiew
The Stanley Foundation

Paul Walker
Global Green USA

Jim Walsh
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Peter Wilk, MD
Physicians for Social Responsibility

Posted in: Blog

Tweets by Livable World

Recent Posts

  • Statement on the Passing of Former Congresswoman Patricia Schroeder March 15, 2023
  • House Elections: Democratic and Republican Target Seats March 13, 2023
  • An early look at the 2024 House elections March 7, 2023
  • An early glimpse at 2024 Senate elections February 21, 2023
  • Press the Button: The Clock is Ticking February 14, 2023
Council for a Livable World logo

820 1st Street NE, Suite LL-180
Washington, D.C. 20002
Phone: 202.543.4100

Elections

  • Meet The Candidates
  • Senate Candidates
  • House Candidates
  • Who We’ve Helped Elect

Legislation

  • Key National Security Legislation
  • National Security Legislative Calendar
  • Legislative Achievements

Take Action

  • Issues
  • Join Our Email List
  • Become a Member

About

  • History & Mission
  • Staff
  • Press
  • Newsletter
  • Boards & Experts
  • Jobs & Internships
  • Financials and Annual Reports
  • Contact Us
  • Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Instagram
  • Facebook

© 2023 Council for a Livable World
Privacy Policy