Council for a Livable World

Political action to reduce nuclear threats

  • Elections
    • Senate Victories
    • House Victories
    • Political Analysis
    • Who We’ve Helped Elect
  • Legislation
    • Key National Security Legislation
    • National Security Legislative Calendar
    • Legislative Achievements
  • Take Action
    • Avoiding Oppenheimer’s Nuclear Nightmare in Our Current Reality
    • Twin Threats: Climate Change and Nuclear War
    • Issues
    • Join Our Email List
    • Become a Member
  • About
    • Staff
    • Press
    • Newsletter
    • Boards & Experts
    • Jobs & Internships
    • Financials and Annual Reports
    • Contact Us
  • Donate
  • Search
You are here: Home / Council: Front and Center / Council: Front and Center: November 19, 2022

November 19, 2022

Council: Front and Center: November 19, 2022

The Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation is the Council’s affiliated 501(c)(3) research organization.

 

RUSSIAN RETREAT AND A TRAGEDY IN POLAND

Last week, Russian troops withdrew from the city of Kherson and territory along the Dnipro River, demonstrating that they could not withstand the strong defenses put up by Ukrainian forces. Senior Policy Director John Erath argues in a new op-ed in The National Interest that Russia’s failed invasion is proof that nuclear weapons are of no military value. Why? Because Russia has the largest nuclear arsenal in the world, and it hasn’t helped them avoid military defeat. Erath also told unaffiliated Russian-language news station RTVI late last month that he believes the risk of nuclear weapons use is still low.

 

Earlier this week, two people in Poland were accidentally killed by what is believed to be Ukrainian defense systems, though Ukraine denies this. Erath told Newsweek that regardless of whose equipment it was, “ultimately, the responsibility lies with Russia for starting the war.”

 

The United States’ top military officer said he was unable to reach his Russian counterpart in the immediate aftermath. Executive Director John Tierney told the Associated Press that this is worrisome and that open lines of communication “are vital if we are to avoid the risk of conflict caused by misconception, miscalculations or mistake.” His unabridged quote acknowledged, however, that other Biden administration officials were in touch with their counterparts.

 

Unsurprisingly, U.S. officials have used the war in Ukraine to “justify” excessive and unnecessary Pentagon spending, as Policy Analyst Monica Montgomery details in the November cover story for Arms Control Today.

 

“By the end of this decade, when modernization spending as now projected is set to peak, nuclear weapons could account for nearly 10 percent of total U.S. national defense spending. Nothing about the situation in Ukraine recommends such a course. If anything, Russia’s lack of military success, despite possessing the world’s largest nuclear arsenal, argues for less U.S. reliance on nuclear weapons for anything beyond deterrence,” she writes.

 

NUCLEAR POSTURE REVIEW TAKES ‘SOME STEPS IN THE RIGHT DIRECTION’

The Biden administration released on October 27 its long-awaited unclassified Nuclear Posture Review (NPR), the document that details its nuclear weapons policies.

 

Our analysts read all 80 pages and broke down the key policies in a two-page explainer covering the Biden administration’s stances on the role and purpose of nuclear weapons; support and rejection of particular weapons systems; follow-on talks to the only remaining nuclear arms treaty between the United States and Russia; engagement with China and Iran, and more.

 

In a statement released to the press immediately after the document was published, Executive Director John Tierney said that while the Center is pleased that the NPR “takes some steps in the right direction” to reduce nuclear risks and promote global nuclear arms control, we are “disappointed that it does not go far enough toward reducing the role of nuclear weapons in U.S. national security strategy, especially in light of Russia’s ongoing nuclear threats.”

 

Policy Analyst Monica Montgomery told the Santa Fe New Mexican that the NPR shows that the Biden administration is still prioritizing plutonium pit production, which she said is unnecessary to maintain the safety and reliability of the existing U.S. nuclear stockpile.

 

NORTH KOREA RAMPS UP MISSILE TESTS; BIDEN WARNS OF ‘DEFENSIVE ACTION’

President Joe Biden warned that the United States would take unspecified defensive action against North Korea if it continues provocative missile launches. Biden met with the leaders of Japan and South Korea on Sunday and agreed on a unified and coordinated response to Pyongyang’s nuclear and ballistic missile programs. Washington and Seoul conducted one of their largest joint military air exercises earlier this month as a united show of allied power, but recent escalatory maneuvers from North Korea have prompted Japan and South Korea to shore up their deterrence capabilities rather than rely on their alliances with the United States.

 

Biden then met Chinese President Xi Jinping Monday at the Group of 20 (G20) summit. Despite warm rhetoric and agreements to work together on some issues, Biden also told his Chinese counterpart that Beijing had “an obligation” to dissuade North Korea from further test-firing nuclear missiles. U.S. officials have criticized China for enabling Pyongyang’s missile development and nuclear weapons program. Despite the UN Security Council sanctions against the country, China and Russia have failed to properly enforce measures that would restrict critical materials from reaching the hermit kingdom.

 

North Korea ratcheted up tensions earlier this month with 26 missile tests, 180 military flights and hundreds of artillery shelling near the border Korean regions. One of these missiles landed about 35 miles off South Korea’s coastline. Pyongyang launched an intercontinental ballistic missile over Japan in September and launched another ICBM on Friday that landed in Japan’s exclusive economic zone as Vice President Kamala Harris attended the Asia-Pacific Economic Forum in Bangkok, Thailand. She called on the DPRK to “stop further unlawful, destabilizing acts” and affirmed the U.S. commitment to its Indo-Pacific partners.

 

WAR IN UKRAINE AND PROTESTS JEOPARDIZE IRAN DEAL

Iranian drone sales to Russia and the Iranian regime’s crushing of recent protests have dashed the chances of a new Iran deal for now. The United States, United Kingdom and European Union imposed new sanctions on Iran in response to their sale of Shahed suicide drones to Russia, which have been used to cripple Ukraine’s energy network.

 

The EU further sanctioned Tehran’s security forces for their crackdown of protestors and continued air strikes in northern Iraq.

The U.S. Special Envoy for Iran, Rob Malley, solidified pessimism around the agreement saying that the United States is focused on matters with Iran “where we can be useful” and is not going to “waste our time … if nothing’s going to happen.” European allies reiterated the sentiment. French President Emmanuel Macron said that a “new framework” will likely be needed to revive a future nuclear deal with Iran.

 

GOOD ELECTION RESULTS FOR COUNCIL ENDORSEES 

The pundits, pollsters and politicians were all wrong: an election that was pointing to a red wave with the GOP taking the House by a sizable margin and a chance of winning the Senate fizzled.

 

Despite President Joe Biden’s poor approval rating, it was the best midterm showing by a first-term Democratic President since President John F. Kennedy in 1962.

 

The Council endorsed 26 House candidates, and so far, 25 have been called by the Associated Press or conceded. Of those 25, 21 of our House candidates have won. In the Senate, six of the nine Council-endorsed candidates won their elections. The full list is at the bottom of this email. Our work now turns to helping those endorsees shape the agenda for the next Congress to continue pushing for reduced reliance on nuclear weapons and diplomacy-first foreign policy.

 

CONGRESS RETURNS WITH EXTENSIVE AGENDA

Congress returned to work from the election break this week and faces a substantial agenda, including on national security issues.

 

One of the major bills on the agenda in the lame duck is the Fiscal Year 2023 National Defense Authorization Act. Citing Russian aggression in Ukraine and a Chinese nuclear and conventional weapon buildup, the Biden administration proposed a whopping $813 billion military budget. The House has hiked that total by $37 billion and the Senate added even more at $44 billion.

 

House-Senate committees have been working at a staff level to reconcile the two bills, but Members of Congress will make the final decisions on the big items. It won’t be a pretty sight, but the Council is working hard to promote policies we support in the bill

 

Two appropriations bills are also in play, the Fiscal Year 2023 Defense Appropriations and Energy and Water Appropriations bills. Congress has until December 16 to pass either a full appropriations package or another stopgap measure to fund the government.

 

NEW FACT SHEETS HIGHLIGHT TREATIES, CLOSE CALLS

Center staffers have been hard at work updating and creating new fact sheets. We typically send these brief summaries to Congress when relevant to quickly bring them up to speed on critical issues, but we also send them to the media, the public and, of course, supporters like you.

 

New this month:

  • F-35 Joint Strike Fighter (update)
  • Preventing a Dirty Bomb: Why Radiological Security Matters (update)
  • Thermonuclear Weapons
  • Treaties, arranged chronologically to complement existing treaties on our fact sheet page: Outer Space Treaty; Strategic Arms Limitation Treaty I (Interim Agreement); Strategic Arms Limitation Treaty II (SALT II); Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty I (START I); Conventional Forces in Europe (CFE) Treaty; and Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty II (START II). More to come!
  • Nuclear crises and close calls: Yom Kippur War; the Brasstacks Crisis. Unfortunately, more to come here, too.

We believe that a solid understanding of where we’ve been is essential to navigating these increasingly turbulent times. As we seek to inform lawmakers and the public about the past, these history lessons also serve as a warning for the present and future: as long as nuclear weapons exist, so do severe dangers.

 

THE LATEST IN BIOLOGICAL AND CHEMICAL THREATS
Members of the Scientists Working Group on Biological and Chemical Security, which the Center has hosted since 2003, have been busy writing and being interviewed in the news lately. Here’s the latest:

  • Controlling Novichok Nerve Agents after the Skripal and Navalny Incidents, by Dr. Stefano Costanzi and Dr. Gregory D. Koblentz
  • Virus experiments like Boston University’s covid ‘chimera’ are going to happen. How should we regulate them?, featuring Koblentz
  • Experimenting With Disaster, a three-part series on biolab dangers by The Intercept, featuring Koblentz
  • The “Frankenviruses” at the heart of the debates, after the emergence of Covid-19, featuring Koblentz (article is in French and behind a paywall)
  • A Plan B to Strengthen Biosafety and Biosecurity, by Koblentz and Filippa Lentzos

MONICA MONTGOMERY: POLICIES FOR PEACE
Council Political Director and Center Policy Analyst Monica Montgomery was profiled as a woman in science by Frontiers Science News. In this interview, she explains how a college trip to the Vatican inspired her to work in nuclear weapons policy and how she hopes her work will lead to a renewed consensus in Washington that arms control is good for U.S. national security. She also discusses the importance of diversity in the nuclear policy field and how other women in the field have helped her get where she is today.

 

NUCLEAR READING AND ART RECOMMENDATIONS
In September, we shared with you reading recommendations from Executive Director and former Congressman John Tierney and asked if you had any of your own.

 

One of our readers recommends Gambling with Armageddon by Martin Sherwin, who, our reader notes, has recently passed.

 

Another reader recommends Report from Iron Mountain on the Possibility & Desirability of Peace, a satirical book from 1967 that our reader finds to be an interesting take on Cold War relations.

 

Do you have any favorite nuclear weapons books, media or art? We’d love to hear from you; email Communications Director Anna Schumann and let us know!

 

WHAT ELSE

Six Questions Every Candidate Should be Asked on Nuclear and Climate Policies, by Political Director Monica Montgomery

 

Dulce et Decorum Est Pro Patria Mori, by intern Casey Kitchens

 

Non-Proliferation is Not Dead, by intern Casey Kitchens

 

60 Years After the Cuban Missile Crisis, We Should Learn from the Past, Not Manipulate It, by Senior Policy Director John Erath

 

CONSIDER BECOMING A MONTHLY DONOR

Elections are over and now it’s time for the Council to ramp up its advocacy work on Capitol Hill. Have you considered making a monthly donation to support our efforts to reduce and eventually eliminate nuclear threats through political action? You can donate as little as $1 a month. Become a monthly supporter today!

 

HOUSE VICTORIES

  • Rep. Colin Allred (D-TX-32)
  • Becca Balint (D-VT-AL)
  • Rep. Ami Bera (D-CA-06)
  • Rep. Don Beyer (D-VA-08)
  • Rep. Angie Craig (D-MN-02)
  • Rep. Lloyd Doggett (D-TX-37)
  • Rep. Bill Foster (D-IL-11)
  • Rep. John Garamendi (D-CA-08)
  • Rep. Chrissy Houlahan (D-PA-06)
  • Jeff Jackson (D-NC-14)
  • Rep. Sara Jacobs (D-CA-51)
  • Rep. Andy Kim (D-NJ-03)
  • Rep. Annie Kuster (D-NH-02)
  • Greg Landsman (D-OH-01)
  • Rep. Teresa Leger Fernandez (D-NM-03)
  • Rep. Mike Levin (D-CA-49)
  • Rep. Joe Neguse (D-CO-02)
  • Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN-05)
  • Rep. Katie Porter (D-CA-47)
  • Eric Sorensen (D-IL-17)
  • Rep. Susan Wild (D-PA-07)

 

HOUSE LOSSES

  • Jay Chen (D-CA-45)
  • Eric Lynn (D-FL-13)
  • Rep. Tom Malinowski (D-NJ-07)
  • Christy Smith (D-CA-27)

 AWAITING RESULTS

  • Rep. Mary Peltola (D-AK-AL)

SENATE VICTORIES

  • Sen. Michael Bennet (D-CO)
  • Sen. Maggie Hassan (D-NH)
  • Sen. Patty Murray (D-WA)
  • John Fetterman (D-PA)
  • Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-MD)
  • Rep. Peter Welch (D-VT)

SENATE LOSSES

  • Mandela Barnes (D-WI)
  • Cheri Beasley (D-NC)
  • Rep. Tim Ryan (D-OH)

Posted in: Council: Front and Center

Recent Posts

  • An Early Look at the 2026 Senate Elections May 9, 2025
  • Shawn Rostker: ‘Quiet diplomacy is likely happening, even if the public posture is more restrained’ May 7, 2025
  • Council: Front and Center: April 21, 2025 April 21, 2025
  • Council: Front and Center: March 22, 2025 March 22, 2025
  • STATEMENT ON TRUMP-ZELENSKYY OVAL OFFICE MEETING February 28, 2025
Council for a Livable World logo

820 1st Street NE, Suite LL-180
Washington, D.C. 20002
Phone: 202.543.4100

Elections

  • Meet The Candidates
  • Senate Candidates
  • House Candidates
  • Who We’ve Helped Elect

Legislation

  • Key National Security Legislation
  • National Security Legislative Calendar
  • Legislative Achievements

Take Action

  • Issues
  • Join Our Email List
  • Become a Member

About

  • History & Mission
  • Staff
  • Press
  • Newsletter
  • Boards & Experts
  • Jobs & Internships
  • Financials and Annual Reports
  • Contact Us
  • Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Instagram
  • Facebook

© 2025 Council for a Livable World
Privacy Policy