Council for a Livable World

Political action to reduce nuclear threats

  • Elections
    • Senate Victories
    • House Victories
    • Political Analysis
    • Who We’ve Helped Elect
  • Legislation
    • Key National Security Legislation
    • National Security Legislative Calendar
    • Legislative Achievements
  • Take Action
    • Avoiding Oppenheimer’s Nuclear Nightmare in Our Current Reality
    • Twin Threats: Climate Change and Nuclear War
    • Issues
    • Join Our Email List
    • Become a Member
  • About
    • Staff
    • Press
    • Newsletter
    • Boards & Experts
    • Jobs & Internships
    • Financials and Annual Reports
    • Contact Us
  • Donate
  • Search
You are here: Home / Blog / Prevent Nuclear Technology Leading to Nuclear Bombs

January 26, 2011

Prevent Nuclear Technology Leading to Nuclear Bombs

GE-Hitachi has applied to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) to build a uranium enrichment facility in North Carolina using new laser technology. This specific type of technology poses serious proliferation risks because it is smaller, more efficient and possibly less expensive than current enrichment technologies.

While the grand bargain of the 1970 Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty is that countries are permitted to develop nuclear power as long as they forswear nuclear bombs, it is critical to keep a sharp dividing line between the two.

The new technology risks eroding that line.

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission refuses to conduct a proliferation assessment for this technology. In response, the American Physical Society (APS) has submitted a petition to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission requesting that this federal agency include proliferation analyses in its licensing process.

Please take a few minutes to send a letter to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, telling them you support the petition requiring proliferation analyses in the licensing process for enrichment facilities.

The Nuclear Regulator Commission claims that a review of the proliferation risks of nuclear technologies is not within its jurisdiction.  The Atomic Energy Act, however, specifically requires the agency to deny licenses that would be “inimical to the common defense and security” of the United States.

Do not let the Nuclear Regulator Commission grant licenses without considering the proliferation implications; please write them today!

Thank you for all your hard work!

Posted in: Blog

Recent Posts

  • An Early Look at the 2026 House of Representatives Elections May 29, 2025
  • An Early Look at the 2026 Senate Elections May 9, 2025
  • Shawn Rostker: ‘Quiet diplomacy is likely happening, even if the public posture is more restrained’ May 7, 2025
  • Council: Front and Center: April 21, 2025 April 21, 2025
  • Council: Front and Center: March 22, 2025 March 22, 2025
Council for a Livable World logo

820 1st Street NE, Suite LL-180
Washington, D.C. 20002
Phone: 202.543.4100

Elections

  • Meet The Candidates
  • Senate Candidates
  • House Candidates
  • Who We’ve Helped Elect

Legislation

  • Key National Security Legislation
  • National Security Legislative Calendar
  • Legislative Achievements

Take Action

  • Issues
  • Join Our Email List
  • Become a Member

About

  • History & Mission
  • Staff
  • Press
  • Newsletter
  • Boards & Experts
  • Jobs & Internships
  • Financials and Annual Reports
  • Contact Us
  • Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Instagram
  • Facebook

© 2025 Council for a Livable World
Privacy Policy