Council for a Livable World

Political action to reduce nuclear threats

  • Elections
    • Senate Candidates
    • House Candidates
    • Political Analysis
    • Who We’ve Helped Elect
  • Legislation
    • Key National Security Legislation
    • National Security Legislative Calendar
    • Legislative Analysis
    • Legislative Achievements
  • Take Action
    • Issues
    • Join Our Email List
    • Become a Member
  • About
    • Staff
    • Press
    • Newsletter
    • Boards & Experts
    • Jobs & Internships
    • Financials and Annual Reports
    • Contact Us
  • Donate
  • Search
You are here: Home / Press Room / Press Releases / Baker-Hamilton Report May Be The Catalyst For Change In Iraq

October 31, 2006

Baker-Hamilton Report May Be The Catalyst For Change In Iraq

Washington, D.C. – In an analysis released today, the Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation suggested that the much-anticipated report from James Baker and Lee Hamilton’s Iraq Study Group (ISG) has the greatest potential to produce a changed Iraq policy since 2002.

If the prognosticators are proven correct and the Democrats win back the House and/or Senate, many Republicans will blame Iraq. Travis Sharp, Herbert Scoville Peace Fellow at the Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation, argues that “The release of Baker and Hamilton’s report may offer Republicans a face-saving alternative to their staunch support for a bad war. Republican defectors could flee the Bush camp en masse and shift the dynamics of the debate in a more bipartisan direction.�

Sharp continues: “The Democrats stand to gain enormously from the Iraq Study Group’s report and may finally be able to seize the middle ground on Iraq before the Republicans are done licking their wounds from November. They will possess a combination of political weapons that could pressure President Bush to relax his iron grip on our nation’s misguided Middle East policy.�

If President Bush fails to heed Baker and Hamilton’s recommendations after they are released in December or January, it could severely embarrass Baker and exacerbate the Bush I v. Bush II foreign policy schism. The resulting confrontation may pit the rebuffed Baker, Colin Powell, Richard Armitage, and Brent Scowcroft against Bush II insiders Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, and John Bolton.

“Bush I’s team has remained publicly quiet throughout the Iraqi adventure but Bush II’s rejection of Baker could be the last straw and unleash a circular firing squad,� said Sharp.

Posted in: Press Releases

Tweets by Livable World

Recent Posts

  • Statement on the Passing of Former Congresswoman Patricia Schroeder March 15, 2023
  • House Elections: Democratic and Republican Target Seats March 13, 2023
  • An early look at the 2024 House elections March 7, 2023
  • An early glimpse at 2024 Senate elections February 21, 2023
  • Press the Button: The Clock is Ticking February 14, 2023
Council for a Livable World logo

820 1st Street NE, Suite LL-180
Washington, D.C. 20002
Phone: 202.543.4100

Elections

  • Meet The Candidates
  • Senate Candidates
  • House Candidates
  • Who We’ve Helped Elect

Legislation

  • Key National Security Legislation
  • National Security Legislative Calendar
  • Legislative Achievements

Take Action

  • Issues
  • Join Our Email List
  • Become a Member

About

  • History & Mission
  • Staff
  • Press
  • Newsletter
  • Boards & Experts
  • Jobs & Internships
  • Financials and Annual Reports
  • Contact Us
  • Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Instagram
  • Facebook

© 2023 Council for a Livable World
Privacy Policy