Council for a Livable World

Political action to reduce nuclear threats

  • Elections
    • Senate Victories
    • House Victories
    • Political Analysis
    • Who We’ve Helped Elect
  • Legislation
    • Key National Security Legislation
    • National Security Legislative Calendar
    • Legislative Achievements
  • Take Action
    • Avoiding Oppenheimer’s Nuclear Nightmare in Our Current Reality
    • Twin Threats: Climate Change and Nuclear War
    • Issues
    • Join Our Email List
    • Become a Member
  • About
    • Staff
    • Press
    • Newsletter
    • Boards & Experts
    • Jobs & Internships
    • Financials and Annual Reports
    • Contact Us
  • Donate
  • Search
You are here: Home / Press Room / Press Releases / Baker-Hamilton Report May Be The Catalyst For Change In Iraq

October 31, 2006

Baker-Hamilton Report May Be The Catalyst For Change In Iraq

Washington, D.C. – In an analysis released today, the Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation suggested that the much-anticipated report from James Baker and Lee Hamilton’s Iraq Study Group (ISG) has the greatest potential to produce a changed Iraq policy since 2002.

If the prognosticators are proven correct and the Democrats win back the House and/or Senate, many Republicans will blame Iraq. Travis Sharp, Herbert Scoville Peace Fellow at the Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation, argues that “The release of Baker and Hamilton’s report may offer Republicans a face-saving alternative to their staunch support for a bad war. Republican defectors could flee the Bush camp en masse and shift the dynamics of the debate in a more bipartisan direction.�

Sharp continues: “The Democrats stand to gain enormously from the Iraq Study Group’s report and may finally be able to seize the middle ground on Iraq before the Republicans are done licking their wounds from November. They will possess a combination of political weapons that could pressure President Bush to relax his iron grip on our nation’s misguided Middle East policy.�

If President Bush fails to heed Baker and Hamilton’s recommendations after they are released in December or January, it could severely embarrass Baker and exacerbate the Bush I v. Bush II foreign policy schism. The resulting confrontation may pit the rebuffed Baker, Colin Powell, Richard Armitage, and Brent Scowcroft against Bush II insiders Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, and John Bolton.

“Bush I’s team has remained publicly quiet throughout the Iraqi adventure but Bush II’s rejection of Baker could be the last straw and unleash a circular firing squad,� said Sharp.

Posted in: Press Releases

Recent Posts

  • An Early Look at the 2026 House of Representatives Elections May 29, 2025
  • An Early Look at the 2026 Senate Elections May 9, 2025
  • Shawn Rostker: ‘Quiet diplomacy is likely happening, even if the public posture is more restrained’ May 7, 2025
  • Council: Front and Center: April 21, 2025 April 21, 2025
  • Council: Front and Center: March 22, 2025 March 22, 2025
Council for a Livable World logo

820 1st Street NE, Suite LL-180
Washington, D.C. 20002
Phone: 202.543.4100

Elections

  • Meet The Candidates
  • Senate Candidates
  • House Candidates
  • Who We’ve Helped Elect

Legislation

  • Key National Security Legislation
  • National Security Legislative Calendar
  • Legislative Achievements

Take Action

  • Issues
  • Join Our Email List
  • Become a Member

About

  • History & Mission
  • Staff
  • Press
  • Newsletter
  • Boards & Experts
  • Jobs & Internships
  • Financials and Annual Reports
  • Contact Us
  • Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Instagram
  • Facebook

© 2025 Council for a Livable World
Privacy Policy