Council for a Livable World

Political action to reduce nuclear threats

  • Elections
    • Senate Candidates
    • House Candidates
    • Political Analysis
    • Who We’ve Helped Elect
  • Legislation
    • Key National Security Legislation
    • National Security Legislative Calendar
    • Legislative Analysis
    • Legislative Achievements
  • Take Action
    • Issues
    • Join Our Email List
    • Become a Member
  • About
    • Staff
    • Press
    • Newsletter
    • Boards & Experts
    • Jobs & Internships
    • Financials and Annual Reports
    • Contact Us
  • Donate
  • Search
You are here: Home / Press Room / Council in the News / Council for a Livable World Board Member Pens OpEd for OpEdNews.com

October 31, 2012

Council for a Livable World Board Member Pens OpEd for OpEdNews.com

Want to Hear Something Really Scary? Zombies Are Real" Or at Least Could Be

In September, just a few weeks before Halloween, Paul W. S. Anderson released the fifth installment of the Resident Evil story. The film finds the heroine, Alice, needing to escape from the Umbrella Corporation, an evil pharmaceutical company plotting world domination. Eventually, the story ends with Alice and her team fighting to save the human race from extinction in a wasteland filled with superhuman zombies and undead dogs.

The idea of a globe haunted by undead creatures grossed the movie more than $21 million in its opening weekend. Something about the idea of zombies terrifies us and also makes us want to spend $15 for a movie ticket. But, what if the threat of human extinction from a manufactured disease was real?

While zombies remain part of myth — we hope — the threat of human extinction from disease is very real.

Since 1925, the international community has deemed biological weapons too horrible to use and outlawed them, even in warfare. In 1970, President Nixon officially ended the U.S.'s offensive biological weapons program and in 1972, many countries signed the Biological Weapons Convention (BWC) agreeing not to use, retain or produce the weapons that could harm great numbers of people. Since then, 178 countries have signed or joined the regime. Nineteen remain outside the framework.

Despite the nightmare scenario if these weapons are used and nearly four decades of global sentiment against bio-weapons, BWC signatories have been known to cheat, most notably, the Soviet Union. After signing the BWC, the Soviet Union continued to develop biological weapons under the facade of a domestic pharmaceutical program and eventually weaponized plague; smallpox; Marburg, a deadly hemorrhagic fever; Q fever and others, according to Dr. Kenneth Alibek, chief scientist and first deputy director of Biopreparat, a branch of the Soviet's biological weapons program.

Since the fall of the Soviet Union, the Soviet program appears to have ceased. However, nations are still suspected of harboring a desire to produce these weapons. Perhaps the most haunting point is that despite nearly a century of universal abhorrence, there is no way to catch cheaters pursuing weapons with the capacity to kill thousands or more.

Verification is needed because an offensive program can look nearly identical to biodefense, biotechnology or other research programs. The same equipment, samples and protocols used to create weapons are also used to conduct life-saving biomedical research.

There are hundreds of college and pharmaceutical labs. A lab studying ways to prevent parasite transmission in the developing world could easily mask a program to turn that parasite into a weapon.

The creation of a verification program would need transparency, as well as a strong global commitment to intellectual property rights. Establishing a working verification program could be model on existing nuclear weapons verification program with scheduled and surprise inspections.

Once established, standards of action within research would need to be harmonized internationally yet offer exceptions for those projects that promise amazing breakthroughs. These excepted programs working to develop prevention and cures for deadly disease like Ebola, cholera or malaria would be subjected to greater scrutiny since their offer a potential high-return in terms of scientific advance but high-risk in terms of dual-use and offensive capacity.

Sadly, the danger of biological weapons does not end with potentially rational actors. The 2001 anthrax letters and 1984 The Dalles, Oregon salad bar poisonings have displayed a need for an international verification regime that limits the access to dangerous disease-causing microbes by organizations and individuals seeking only terror.

The Resident Evil films and video games, along with the T virus-infected world they created have been a driving force in American science fiction sub-culture since 1996. It's time the true Halloween-horror of biological weapons drive the verification protocol that's been lacking since 1970.

Originally published in OpEdNews October 31, 2012.

Posted in: Council in the News

Tweets by Livable World

Recent Posts

  • Statement on the Passing of Former Congresswoman Patricia Schroeder March 15, 2023
  • House Elections: Democratic and Republican Target Seats March 13, 2023
  • An early look at the 2024 House elections March 7, 2023
  • An early glimpse at 2024 Senate elections February 21, 2023
  • Press the Button: The Clock is Ticking February 14, 2023
Council for a Livable World logo

820 1st Street NE, Suite LL-180
Washington, D.C. 20002
Phone: 202.543.4100

Elections

  • Meet The Candidates
  • Senate Candidates
  • House Candidates
  • Who We’ve Helped Elect

Legislation

  • Key National Security Legislation
  • National Security Legislative Calendar
  • Legislative Achievements

Take Action

  • Issues
  • Join Our Email List
  • Become a Member

About

  • History & Mission
  • Staff
  • Press
  • Newsletter
  • Boards & Experts
  • Jobs & Internships
  • Financials and Annual Reports
  • Contact Us
  • Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Instagram
  • Facebook

© 2023 Council for a Livable World
Privacy Policy