Council for a Livable World

Political action to reduce nuclear threats

  • Elections
    • Senate Candidates
    • House Candidates
    • Political News and Notes
    • Political Analysis
    • Who We’ve Helped Elect
  • Legislation
    • Key National Security Legislation
    • National Security Legislative Calendar
    • Legislative Analysis
    • Legislative Achievements
  • Take Action
    • Issues
    • Join Our Email List
    • Become a Member
  • About
    • Staff
    • Press
    • Newsletter
    • Boards & Experts
    • Jobs & Internships
    • Financials and Annual Reports
    • Contact Us
  • Donate
  • Search
You are here: Home / Uncategorized / GAO Issues Blistering Report on National Missile Defense: Still Not Reliable, Still Not Adequately tested

February 23, 2016

GAO Issues Blistering Report on National Missile Defense: Still Not Reliable, Still Not Adequately tested

ground based midcourse defense - 2The National Missile Defense program based in Alaska and California, which is designed to protect the United States from a North Korean or Iranian missile attack, continues to be unreliable.

That is the conclusion of a February 17, 2016 General Accountability Office (GAO) report on missile defense concerning the Ground-Based Midcourse system (GMD), aka National Missile Defense.

The GAO study concludes, despite extensive testing, the Missile Defense Agency (MDA) “has not demonstrated through flight testing that it can defend the U.S. homeland against the current missile defense threat.”

In other words, after spending many billions of dollars, the interceptors may work, or may not, but no President of the United States should rely on it.

Instead of focusing on fixing the system first, the Missile Defense Agency is disregarding all warning signs by deploying additional interceptor missiles by 2017. According to the GAO, MDA “relying on high-risk acquisition practices to achieve its goal of fielding 44 interceptors by the end of 2017.”

The GAO went on to report, “MDA is relying on a highly optimistic, aggressive schedule that overlaps development and testing with production activities, compromises reliability, extends risk to the warfighter, and risks the efficacy of flight testing.”

This plan runs counter to best practices for major acquisition programs. The GAO has previously recommended that a “demonstration flight test should be conducted before starting production” of rockets for operational use. Another term for this best practice is “fly before you buy.”

The GAO study underscored that U.S. taxpayers have already paid a price for ignoring that commonsense practice — a cost in both dollars and deployment delays. It pointed out: “Because MDA produced the current fleet of interceptors before completing testing, the test failure exacerbated disruptions to the program and contributed to a six-and-a-half-year delay and an approximate $1.75 billion cost increase to the GMD program.”

Indeed, the one consistent pattern in trying to build defenses against the long-range missile threat over past decades is that the U.S. continues to “rush to failure,” in the words of a previous analysis of the program.

These reports do not analyze the shorter range anti-missiles systems, such as AEGIS and Terminal High Altitude Defense (THAAD), which have been more thoroughly and successfully tested.

According to the Pentagon’s generous reckoning, the National Missile Defense system, has had only nine successful tests out of 17 since 1999. That count includes three misses in the most recent four attempts, showing that the GMD system continues to be unreliable.

Moreover, these were highly scripted tests, never tested in an operationally realistic real world environment, never with a full range of decoys and countermeasures that North Korea or Iran might use, and never tested against an Intercontinental Ballistic Missile.

Dean A. Wilkening, a physicist at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in Livermore, Calif., called the system’s test record “abysmal.”

Philip E. Coyle III, who oversaw several early test flights as the Pentagon’s director of operational testing and evaluation from 1994 to 2001, added “The tests are scripted for success. What’s amazing to me is that they still fail.”

These dismal results do not deter National Missile Defense supporters in and outside of Congress from seeking to expand the national missile defense system. Former Senator Sam Nunn hit the nail on the head: “National missile defense has become a theology in the United States, not a technology

Posted in: Uncategorized

Tweets by Livable World

Recent Posts

  • ‘Increases the risk of nuclear escalation’: statement on the NDAA committee approval June 23, 2022
  • Council: Front and Center: June 18, 2022 June 18, 2022
  • Top 11 critical races June 15, 2022
  • House Elections: Democratic and Republican Target Seats June 14, 2022
  • Council: Front and Center: May 21, 2022 May 21, 2022
Council for a Livable World logo

820 1st Street NE, Suite LL-180
Washington, D.C. 20002
Phone: 202.543.4100

Elections

  • Meet The Candidates
  • 2020 Senate Candidates
  • 2020 House Candidates
  • Who We’ve Helped Elect

Legislation

  • Key National Security Legislation
  • National Security Legislative Calendar
  • Legislative Achievements

Take Action

  • Issues
  • Join Our Email List
  • Become a Member

About

  • History & Mission
  • Staff
  • Press
  • Newsletter
  • Boards & Experts
  • Jobs & Internships
  • Financials and Annual Reports
  • Contact Us
  • Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Instagram
  • Facebook

© 2022 Council for a Livable World
Privacy Policy